Categories
Culture, Society & Family Health & Medicine Researcher news SMU In The News

LiveScience: Should You Trust Health Apps on Your Phone?

“The FDA is woefully understaffed and under-resourced to oversee these things, particularly given the number of the thousands of apps that are [most likely] under FDA’s jurisdiction,” — Nathan Cortez

Cortez, SMU, Dedman, mHealth apps

LiveScience covered the research of SMU health law expert Nathan Cortez, an associate professor of law at Southern Methodist University’s Dedman School of Law.

In a report published in The New England Journal of Medicine, Cortez and his co-authors note that smart phones and mobile devices are on the cusp of revolutionizing health care, armed with mobile health apps capable of providing everything from cardiac measurements to sonograms.

LiveScience reporter Bahar Gholipour interviewed Cortez for the July 25 article, “Should you trust health apps on your phone?

Read the full story.

EXCERPT:

By Bahar Gholipour
LiveScience

Personal health is becoming increasingly mobile, and there are now thousands of apps aiming to address everything from lifestyle issues to chronic diseases. But can you trust these apps, the same way you trust your prescribed drugs and medical devices?

Medical devices are generally regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and although the FDA reviews some apps, experts say the agency’s power and efforts aren’t nearly enough to cover the 97,000 and counting health apps out there that are transforming consumer health.

“The FDA is woefully understaffed and under-resourced to oversee these things, particularly given the number of the thousands of apps that are [most likely] under FDA’s jurisdiction,” said health law expert Nathan Cortez, an associate professor of law at Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law in Dallas, Texas.

In an editorial published in The New England Journal of Medicine on Thursday (July 24), Cortez and his colleagues argued that health and medical apps hold the promise of improving health, reducing medical errors, avoiding costly interventions, and broadening access to care. But to reach their potential, these products have to be safe and effective, they said.

A large number of health apps, such as those that help you track your exercise or the calories in your meals, likely don’t pose a concerning risk to consumers. But in more ambitious apps, such as an app to manage insulin doses for diabetic patients, any mistake, bug or misinformation could simultaneously affect thousands of patients, and emerging evidence reveals many products do not work as claimed, or the products make mistakes.

“Early studies evaluating whether these apps work or not tend to paint a pretty dim picture of them. The results aren’t that promising,” Cortez told Live Science.

Which apps need to be regulated?
In September 2013, the FDA gave its position on what types of products and technologies would fall under its jurisdiction. Currently, the agency has a pre-market review process for some apps, meaning that the app developer submits information to the agency to get the FDA’s blessing, Cortez said. The agency also sometimes takes enforcement actions by issuing a public reprimand to a company if its products violate FDA’s rules and regulations.

Read the full story.

SMU is a nationally ranked private university in Dallas founded 100 years ago. Today, SMU enrolls nearly 11,000 students who benefit from the academic opportunities and international reach of seven degree-granting schools. For more information see www.smu.edu.

SMU Dedman School of Law was founded in 1925 and enjoys a national and international reputation of distinction, with graduates who have distinguished themselves as global leaders in law, business and government, and as prominent members of the judiciary.

SMU has an uplink facility located on campus for live TV, radio, or online interviews. To speak with an SMU expert or book an SMU guest in the studio, call SMU News & Communications at 214-768-7650.

Categories
Culture, Society & Family Health & Medicine Technology

Booming mobile-health app market needs robust FDA oversight to ensure consumer safety, confidence

Health Law Experts in July 24 The New England Journal of Medicine say consumers will be spending a lot of money on these products, and venture capital is flying into the industry.

Cortez, mHealth, SMU, Dedman

Smart phones and mobile devices are on the cusp of revolutionizing health care, armed with mobile health apps capable of providing everything from cardiac measurements to sonograms.

While tremendous potential exists to broaden access to medical treatment and control costs with mHealth apps, as they’re called, several health law experts say in a just-published report in The New England Journal of Medicine that more oversight is needed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to ensure consumer confidence and safety.

Out of some 100,000 mHealth apps on the market, only about 100 have been cleared by the FDA. Opponents to tighter regulation see the FDA as a deterrent to innovation — and profits.

“Consumers will be spending a lot of money on these products, and venture capital is flying into the industry,” says the article’s lead author, SMU Dedman School of Law Associate Dean of Research Nathan Cortez, adding that by 2017 mHealth apps are expected to earn $26 billion — up from $2.4 billion in 2013.

The FDA needs “additional funding and in-house technical expertise to oversee the ongoing flood of mHealth products,” the authors note. An under-regulated mobile health industry could create “a Wild West” market, says Cortez, who has conducted extensive research into FDA regulation of mobile health technologies.

“Most consumers take mobile health app claims at face value, and think that because they’re available through a trusted retailer like the iTunes Store, they must have been reviewed by the FDA, which isn’t usually the case,” Cortez says.

Some apps make promises they can’t fulfill, and others make errors that could harm patients
Cortez, who also serves as an associate professor in SMU’s Dedman School of Law, co-wrote the article with Harvard Law School Professor I. Glenn Cohen, faculty director of the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology & Bioethics, and author of Human Subjects Research Regulation: Perspectives on the Future (MIT Press, 2014) and Aaron S. Kesselheim, associate professor of medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School.

“Although the vast majority of mHealth products are very low-risk, some apps make promises they can’t fulfill, and others make errors that could harm patients,” Cortez notes, pointing out that life-threatening technical mistakes are not only possible – they also have occurred.

One of several examples cited in the study includes Sanofi Aventis’ 2012 recall of a diabetes app that miscalculated insulin dosages.

Several Congressional bills have been proposed to strengthen FDA jurisdiction over mHealth products, with one proposing the creation of a new Office of Wireless Health Technology within the administration, the article notes. Meanwhile, more restrictive bills also have been introduced to keep the FDA from regulating “clinical software” or “applying a complex regulatory framework [that] could inhibit future growth and innovation in this promising market.”

“The conventional wisdom is that FDA regulation will stifle innovation, and that’s a very short-term way to think about this,” Cortez says. “Most Silicon Valley firms aren’t used to much federal regulation, and Internet technologies have been subject to very little federal oversight.”

If dangerous errors and disproven product benefits are allowed to proliferate, “some very useful products will be undermined by widespread consumer distrust,” Cortez contends.

“We’re trying to push lawmakers to empower the FDA, not hamstring it,” he says. “Clarity will help the industry create products more helpful than harmful.” — Denise Gee

Follow SMUResearch.com on twitter at @smuresearch.

SMU is a nationally ranked private university in Dallas founded 100 years ago. Today, SMU enrolls nearly 11,000 students who benefit from the academic opportunities and international reach of seven degree-granting schools. For more information see www.smu.edu.

SMU Dedman School of Law was founded in 1925 and enjoys a national and international reputation of distinction, with graduates who have distinguished themselves as global leaders in law, business and government, and as prominent members of the judiciary.

SMU has an uplink facility located on campus for live TV, radio, or online interviews. To speak with an SMU expert or book an SMU guest in the studio, call SMU News & Communications at 214-768-7650.

Categories
Health & Medicine

Medical Tourism: Risky business to seek cheaper health care

More and more Americans are choosing to receive medical treatment — even complicated surgeries — in foreign countries to save big money. The practice is called “medical tourism,” but do the risks to consumers outweigh the savings?

That’s an important question, says Nathan Cortez, SMU Dedman School of Law assistant professor, who is focusing his research in health law on this emerging medical market.

“Patients take a calculated risk by seeking medical care overseas in regulatory systems that may not offer the rights or protections they expect,” Cortez says.

Interviewed for National Public Radio last November, he warned that although patients are free to travel overseas and reap whatever savings they can find, the international shop-around could affect how U.S. hospitals pay for care for the uninsured.

“We see this all the time with other industries,” Cortez told NPR. “Health care has been notoriously a local industry, and now it’s … succumbing to globalization like other industries have.”

Cortez has published the first comprehensive look at how domestic policy-making can offer American medical tourists some level of consumer protection. “Patients Without Borders: The Emerging Global Market for Patients and the Evolution of Modern Health Care” is included in the winter 2008 issue of the “Indiana Law Journal.”

Attempts to restrict patient travel may not be effective, Cortez warns. But he offers some practical approaches to help protect American patients: Regulating the activities of brokers and others who arrange for U.S. patients to travel overseas could provide access to information about the quality of care outside the United States.

Lawmakers could require employers or insurers that encourage patients to have surgery overseas to pay for pre-screening and post-operative care in the United States.

Lawmakers could require employers to share a minimum portion of the cost savings with patients willing to have surgery overseas, which would partially compensate them for any additional risk they may bear.

Although lowering the cost of medical care is a universal concern, Cortez says there is no evidence of American employers requiring employees to seek cross-border treatment. But neither are cost-conscious companies who are quietly adding foreign hospitals to their provider networks seeking publicity for those additions.

“California is the only state where you can buy insurance plans that require treatment outside the United States,” Cortez says. “It’s a niche market for the immigrant population there — you agree to go to Mexico.”

Cortez was a featured speaker at a March symposium on cross-border health care hosted by the Wisconsin International Law Journal, and is conducting research for that publication on the underlying trends that encourage medical tourism.

“I argue that the practices and standards in the medical industry are becoming more similar across borders, which makes medical tourism possible,” Cortez says.

Cortez teaches courses in administrative law, health law, FDA law and the legislative process. Before joining SMU in fall 2007, he practiced with the Washington, D.C., firm of Arnold & Porter representing medical technology clients, with a special emphasis on health care fraud and abuse, FDA enforcement and health privacy. He earned a J.D. from Stanford.

SMU is a nationally ranked private university in Dallas founded 100 years ago. Today, SMU enrolls nearly 11,000 students who benefit from the academic opportunities and international reach of seven degree-granting schools. For more information see www.smu.edu.

SMU Dedman School of Law was founded in 1925 and enjoys a national and international reputation of distinction, with graduates who have distinguished themselves as global leaders in law, business and government, and as prominent members of the judiciary.

SMU has an uplink facility located on campus for live TV, radio, or online interviews. To speak with an SMU expert or book an SMU guest in the studio, call SMU News & Communications at 214-768-7650.