Matthew Hutnyan (U): Alexithymia and Self-Referential Processing in a Healthy Population

Co-authors: Cecile S. Sunahara, Benjamin A. Tabak

https://youtu.be/HjsClBad9bQ

Success in the social world is said to be contingent on how effectively one can decipher the mental and emotional states of others. A growing body of evidence links this ability, known as social cognition, with two psychological constructs: alexithymia – difficulty identifying and describing one’s own emotions – and self-referential processing (SRP) – the process through which we use knowledge of the self to interpret information. This study (n = 396) set out to directly examine the relationship between alexithymia and SRP in a sample of non-clinical individuals. Multilevel modeling was utilized to examine differences in accuracy between words presented in the “self” condition versus the “physical” condition, and then to examine whether alexithymia moderated the effect of referent condition when controlling for age, gender, and depressive symptoms. Results indicated that participants were more accurate at recognizing words that were presented originally with a “self” referent than words presented with a “physical” referent (b = -.39, 95% CI [-.41, -.37], p < .001) and that levels of alexithymia were linked with SRP task accuracy, such that as levels of alexithymia increased, accuracy in the “self” condition decreased. These findings establish a link between alexithymia and SRP at the behavioral level for the first time.

Matthew Hutnyan
Majors: Psychology, Health and Society; Minors: Neuroscience and Cognitive Science
Faculty mentor: Ben Tabak

 

2 thoughts on “Matthew Hutnyan (U): Alexithymia and Self-Referential Processing in a Healthy Population

  1. Interesting study and great presentation! I’ve recently been studying the overlap between self-referential processing and emotional processing, but hadn’t considered how individual differences in alexithymia might be involved. You given me something to think about.

  2. Nice work! I noticed the participants were primarily female, and I’m wondering if you think that affected the results at all. Along those lines, I think it would also be interesting to break down the results by gender.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *