Categories
Culture, Society & Family Health & Medicine Learning & Education Mind & Brain Researcher news SMU In The News

DMN: Why Texas should ban corporal punishment in schools

The Dallas Morning News invited SMU Psychology Professor and parenting expert George Holden to participate in its opinion page face-off on corporal punishment. Holden, an advocate of positive parenting strategies, is opposed to corporal punishment in either the home or at school.

His opinion piece “Why Texas should ban corporal punishment in schools” appeared in the May 29, 2011, edition of The Dallas Morning News.

Holden, who’s published five books and more than 55 scientific papers on parenting and child development, says hundreds of studies on spanking have revealed the negative long-term impacts of corporal punishment. Holden was an organizer of the June 3-4 international conference “Global Summit on Ending Corporal Punishment and Promoting Positive Discipline” in Dallas.

Read the full op-ed piece.

EXCERPT:

By George Holden
Professor of Psychology at SMU

She had been struck 10 years earlier, but the student in my college psychology course remembered every detail vividly. As a fifth-grader attending public school in a town near Houston, she was falsely accused of writing in a textbook and sent to the principal’s office. The student’s denial enraged the principal, who, while yelling, hit her three times with a ruler.

The student’s parents had not given permission to the school to use corporal punishment, but school officials mistakenly found the permission form of a student with the same surname. My student reported feeling traumatized by the incident and becoming withdrawn, with a lingering fear of teachers and distrust of authority figures.

The physical punishment inflicted upon this student is by no means rare. Nineteen states in this country, primarily in the South and West, have not yet banned corporal punishment in public schools. Reported incidents have declined in the past 30 years, but not enough. According to the most recent analysis by the Department of Education’s civil rights office, more than 220,000 students nationwide were subjected to corporal punishment in 2006.

Texas schools have the dubious distinction of leading the nation in that analysis, accounting for more than 49,000 cases. Only about 40 of the state’s school districts prohibit corporal punishment, including large urban districts such as Dallas and Fort Worth, while more than 1,000 districts permit it. Their school boards have created a hodgepodge of policies, some of which specify the instrument, method and administrator of punishment, as well as whether parents must be notified.

Read the full op-ed piece.

Categories
Culture, Society & Family Learning & Education Mind & Brain Researcher news SMU In The News

Dallas Morning News: ‘Meta-parenting’ helps you give better guidance

Dallas Morning News reporter Tyra Damm interviewed SMU Psychology Professor George W. Holden about a new parenting theory he’s developed that bridges the long-standing conflict between the nature vs. nurture models of child development.

Called “meta-parenting, Holden’s model holds that how a child turns out is a factor of both nature and nurture — as well as parental guidance shaped by a child’s own strengths.

Holden calls the new theory meta-parenting and explains that it goes beyond the “either-or” conflict of nature vs. nurture. Damm’s article “‘Meta-parenting’ helps you give better guidance” features a question and answer with Holden.

Read the full story.

EXCERPT:

By Tyra Damm
Dallas Morning News

Dr. George Holden, a psychologist and professor at Southern Methodist University, studies relationships between parents and children. He’s also the proud dad of three children — a recent college graduate, a college junior and a high school student.

Holden’s most recent publication, in the journal Child Development Perspectives, describes the role that parents play in directing children along developmental paths.

His theory is that parents who provide the best guidance are those who recognize a child’s strengths, help that child according to his needs and redirect when obstacles get in the way.

I spoke with Dr. Holden this week about his research. Here are excerpts.

Can you explain the theory you’ve written about?

One of the unrecognized, important roles that parents play is to guide their children on positive pathways of development. There are many different kinds of pathways: academic, learning, school-focused, social competence, athletic, musical, religious.

Some parents are into politics and rear their children to be politically savvy. Some parents of girls think, “What do I need to do to raise my daughter so she can get married?” Some have a general pathway of keeping the child from becoming a criminal.

What I argue is that part of the role of parents is to help the child identify where strengths and talents lie so they can develop the strengths and foster self-esteem.

Is the ability to provide good guidance innate? Or do parents who provide the best guidance have to study and work to get there?

Generally I’d say parents who are more conscious about it are going to do a good job. It’s what I call meta-parenting, that is, parents thinking about their children and child-rearing outside of ongoing reactions.

Meta-parenting has four components: anticipating, assessing the child, problem solving and reflecting. All of those components are used and needed in the process of guidance.

When a child goes off track — with a peer problem, a health problem, dyslexia — how does the parent go about making course corrections? Do they take action or not? Do they choose a good solution? Who do they turn to? Do they get good sources of information to deal with the problem?

Read the full story.

Categories
Culture, Society & Family Learning & Education Mind & Brain Plants & Animals

New child development theory bridges nature vs. nurture; parental guidance shapes child’s strengths

How a child turns out determined by nature, nurture — and parental guidance shaped by child’s strengths

Why does a child grow up to become a lawyer, a politician, a professional athlete, an environmentalist or a churchgoer?

It’s determined by our inherited genes, say some researchers. Still others say the driving force is our upbringing and the nurturing we get from our parents.

But a new child-development theory bridges those two models, says psychologist George W. Holden at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. Holden’s theory holds that the way a child turns out can be determined in large part by the day-to-day decisions made by the parents who guide that child’s growth.

“This model helps to resolve the nature-nurture debate,” Holden says. “Effective parents are taking nature into account in their nurturing. It’s a slightly different twist.”

Parental guidance is key
Child development researchers largely have ignored the importance of parental “guidance,” Holden says. In his model, effective parents observe, recognize and assess their child’s individual genetic characteristics, then cultivate their child’s strengths.

“It’s been said that parents are the ‘architect’ or the ‘conductor’ of a child’s development. There are lots of different synonyms, but the terms don’t capture the essence that parents are trying to ‘guide,'” Holden says. “Some parents have more refined goals — like wanting their child to be an athlete or to have a particular career. Some have more general goals — such as not wanting their child to become a criminal. But all are positive goals.”

Holden describes and explains his theory and research in the article “Childrearing and Developmental Trajectories: Positive Pathways, Off-ramps, and Dynamic Processes” in the current issue of the journal Child Development Perspectives. The theory is also detailed in his child psychology textbook, “Parenting, A Dynamic Perspective,” published by Sage Publications Inc., 2010.

Parents help or hinder progress
In decades past, researchers have studied many aspects of parenting that Holden describes as “unidimensional” and easier to quantify than guidance. Examples include: how parents reinforce their children’s behavior, punish their children or show them love and warmth.

Only in the last decade have researchers studied the role parents play in helping or hindering their child’s progress toward — or abandonment of — a particular course of development, he says.

“It’s not an easy set of behaviors to observe and quantify because it’s more complex in that it relates to parental goals that they have for their children,” he says. “It’s also multi-faceted. It’s not a simple unitary behavior that can be easily and reliably counted up. So there are methodological reasons it hasn’t been studied, and there are also biases and theoretical orientations that have neglected this.”

The time has come, however, to understand the impact of parental guidance, Holden says. Sophisticated statistical procedures now allow new research techniques such as growth-curve modeling and group-based trajectory analysis. Other child development experts have ventured into the interaction between child and parent trajectories, says Holden. He hopes many more will join in advancing the concept, which he considers critical to understanding child development.

“I’m certainly not the first to think of this, but I’ve framed it a little differently and a little more comprehensively than it’s been discussed before,” Holden says. “I’m sure there are things I haven’t thought of, so hopefully this will generate discussion, research and modification. And I hope it will trickle down to parents so they can see the critical role they can play in helping their children develop in positive ways.”

Pathways or trajectories
In his conceptual framework, Holden hypothesizes that parents guide their children’s development in four complex and dynamic ways:

  • Parents initiate trajectories, sometimes trying to steer their child in a preferred developmental path based on either the parents’ preferences or their observations of the child’s characteristics and abilities, such as enrolling their child in a class, exposing them to people and places, or taking a child to practices or lessons;
  • Parents also sustain their child’s progress along trajectories with encouragement and praise, by providing material assistance such as books, equipment or tutoring, and by allocating time to practice or participate in certain activities;
  • Parents mediate trajectories, which influences how their child perceives and understands a trajectory, and help their child steer clear of negative trajectories by preparing the child to deal with potential problems;
  • Finally, parents react to child-initiated trajectories.

Trajectories are useful images for thinking about development because one can easily visualize concepts like “detours,” “roadblocks” and “off-ramps,” Holden says. Detours, he says, are transitional events that can redirect a pathway, such as divorce. Roadblocks are events or behavior that shut down a potential trajectory, such as teen pregnancy, which can block an educational path. Off-ramps are exits from a positive trajectory, such as abusing drugs, getting bullied or joining a gang.

Holden says there are other ways parents influence a child’s progress on a trajectory, such as through modeling desired behaviors, or modifying the speed of development by controlling the type and number of experiences.

Some of the ways in which children react to trajectories include accepting, negotiating, resisting or rejecting them, he says.

“Some factors that also can influence trajectories include the family’s culture, their income and family resources, and the quality of the parent-child relationship,” says Holden. “What this model of parenting helps to point out is that effective parenting involves guiding children in such a way as to ensure that they are developing along positive trajectories.”

Holden is a professor in the SMU Department of Psychology. — Margaret Allen

SMU has an uplink facility on campus for live TV, radio or online interviews. To speak with Dr. Holden or to book him in the SMU studio, call SMU News & Communications at 214-768-7650.

SMU is a private university in Dallas where nearly 11,000 students benefit from the national opportunities and international reach of SMU’s seven degree-granting schools. For more information see www.smu.edu.