Contact tracing can stop COVID-19 — only if Americans allow government access to personal data

 

Aug. 25, Jo Guldi and Macabe Keliher, history professors at SMU Dallas, for a piece advocating that the U.S. emulate Taiwan by devising a way for the government to access location data to alert citizens during emergencies or during efforts to mitigate infection spread during a pandemic. Published in The Hill and MSN: https://bit.ly/2QqGptt https://bit.ly/34A65w8

Most Americans await a vaccine to end the pandemic and get us back to work. But the drama about vaccines and masks has obscured a practical answer to ending the pandemic that has already worked in other parts of the world, and which could end the pandemic across the U.S. in only a month, at minimal cost: contact tracing. Contact tracing means entrusting government representatives or corporations with intimate data about individuals’ locations and creating a potentially sensitive repository of information about citizens. That data can save lives — but it will only come into being if Americans trust the system for managing that data. 

American cities and states have mainly opted to avoid contact tracing and the shortcut out of the pandemic that it offers. The ostensible reason offered is American’s concern about data privacy, which is both legitimate and important. . .

Continue reading “Contact tracing can stop COVID-19 — only if Americans allow government access to personal data”

How does it make any sense to click away our right to privacy?

 

Feb. 27, Robert Howell, Chair of the SMU Dallas Philosophy Department, for a piece questioning the wisdom and necessity of surrendering our privacy to use apps and social media channels that demand we click on boxes to proceed. Published in The Hill: http://bit.ly/2vpkHzd

There is little doubt that privacy clauses and terms of service agreements don’t support the moral burden they are meant to carry. All too often they are designed to provide political cover rather than to generate informed consent. 

Not only does no one read them, but even if someone did and had the attention span and intelligence to follow them, it’s doubtful that they would find all the policies hidden in documents several clicks deep. 

Interesting fact: If the average American actually read all the policies they encountered, they would lose 76 full workdays in the process. The cost to productivity, if all Americans were so conscientious, would approach $1 trillion. . .

Continue reading “How does it make any sense to click away our right to privacy?”